18 July 2010

A Bike is not a Car

I learned how to ride a bike many years ago. It was so fun sailing down the street with the wind blowing through my hair. Then the asthma kicked in and made me go home -- but still, for a few moments, it was fun.

One thing that was stressed a lot when I was young was bicycle safety. I mean, seriously, a bike is not a car, and a collision between the two has pretty predictable results. One of the most important rules I was taught was that you NEVER ride a bike through an intersection -- crosswalk or not. The reason is pretty simple: a bike is small and moves faster than a pedestrian. A person driving a car through an intersection is not expecting a bike to come flying off the sidewalk into his/her path.

Last weekend, a bicyclist in Tempe rode his bike in a crosswalk through an intersection. He was hit by a car, and recently died from his injuries. The case received a lot of attention because the person who hit the cyclist did not remain at the scene (in itself a felony) and the cyclist died.

However, in all the coverage of this accident, not once has it been mentioned that -- yes, all these years since it was taught to me -- it is still illegal in Arizona to ride a bicycle through an intersection. Most bicycle safety manuals suggest walking a bike through a crosswalk; but it is the law in Arizona. If the cyclist in this case had been walking his bike it is less likely he would have been hit (slower speed, more likely to have been seen). It is no guarantee against being hit, but it is safer.

You can see surveillance video of the incident in the two links below (the actual moment of impact is not shown). However, in each you can clearly see the bicyclist entering the crosswalk intersection very fast. Add to that the fact that it was late at night and you can easily see how the accident occurred.

This is no way excuses the driver who left the scene. The irony is, had he stopped, he would most likely have been cleared of any fault because the cyclist was not walking his bike. Now, his life if probably ruined because he fled the scene.

A news report of the accident will be found here.

A follow-up story after an arrest was made is here.

4 comments:

kayojon said...

After watching the video three times I can only see that the bike "driver" was in the lane and not in the crosswalk. This would make the bike a vehicle and be legally traveling through the intersection. Do you have any other facts? Thanks, jk

billd said...

There is no law requiring people to walk their bikes across intersections. You are badly misinformed.

See Arizona Revised Statute 28-812. Applicability of traffic laws to bicycle riders:

"A person riding a bicycle on a roadway or on a shoulder adjoining a roadway is granted all of the rights and is subject to all of the duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle by this chapter and chapters 4 and 5 of this title, except special rules in this article and except provisions of this chapter and chapters 4 and 5 of this title that by their nature can have no application."

Bicycles are essentially like vehicles under the law and should be operated as such.

In the future when making claims about what the law says, you should look the law up first and state the code number, so that people can verify it.

Christopher said...

Billd: Thanks for your comment. It appears I am not alone in believing there is such a law as I did quite a lot of research prior to writing my entry and found numerous sites stating that it is an Arizona law.

You are correct, however, that I did not confirm this with Arizona statutes. I have looked through those and the Phoenix codes and find no such law. This is an eye-opener not only because it is apparently such a widely-held belief, but also that it means my teachers and father lied to me.

Kayojon: Interesting observation. It would seem, according to the Arizona statutes cited by Billd, that it would be considered a vehicle -- not unlike a car.

I think I would rather err on the side of walking a bike in a crosswalk -- even if it is not specifically law -- because when two cars collide there are hundreds of pounds of metal protecting the operators. This is not true of a bicycle.

billd said...

Actually, it's thousands of pounds of metal. However nearly 40000 drivers and passengers are killed in motor vehicle collisions every year. That cage is not as protective as many people think. This belief in the protection of the vehicle is probably why so many people do not drive with enough care to avoid collisions and so speed, roll stop signs and lights, cut across three lanes at once etc.

Looking at the video leading up to the collision, I'm not sure that walking the bike across the intersection would have helped other than changing the timing. It's pretty clear that the driver was not looking for non-car traffic. He could have just as easily run over a pedestrian. The bicyclist even appears to have had a headlight.

Walking bikes across intersections is something that is unfortunately taught to children who generally are too young to be riding in traffic in the first place. Adults can ride in traffic safely. Most people don't understand bicycle safety because it is not required learning and most people do not seek it out. As a result, a lot of people come up with a lot of ideas about bicycle safety that are just plain wrong. That doesn't stop them from telling other people how to ride, which is bad.

I highly recommend that anyone who rides in traffic take a safety class from a qualified instructor. You can find a good one near you through the League of American Bicyclists here:

http://www.bikeleague.org/programs/education/course_schedule.php

Here's a link to a good free online book on bicycle safety. If you can't or don't want to take a class, this will at least give you a good idea of what actually constitutes safe riding:

http://www.bikexprt.com/streetsmarts/usa/index.htm